Has there been a footballer in history who has enjoyed such a dominant maiden season at a new club?Geelongs superstar recruit Patrick Dangerfield has mesmerised and dazzled AFL fans in 2016 with his electric pace, brute strength and countless acts of individual brilliance.On Monday night, Dangerfield -- to almost nobodys surprise -- claimed the AFLs highest individual honour, the Brownlow Medal, just a fortnight after picking up the leagues MVP award. But just how does his season compare to some of the previous winners of the award?ESPN has compiled and analysed every Brownlow winners numbers since the turn of the century, and its fair to say Dangers 2016 stacks up pretty well.Dangerfield shot out of the blocks in round one with a 43-disposal masterclass against reigning premier Hawthorn -- the most by a player on debut for a new club.15 times this season Dangerfield accumulated 30 plus possessions, seven of those were over 35. But what makes him such an exceptional player is his ability to win the ball on the inside as well as the outside.Nat Fyfe set the bar extraordinarily high with his clearance record last year, but Dangerfields effort in 2016 isnt to be disgraced.The 26-year-old was a bull around the stoppages -- often extracting the ball and setting up a Cats teammate with two opposition players hanging off him. Together with Joel Selwood, the duo have become the leagues premier clearance pair.The king of inside 50s. Theres hardly a more iconic AFL image than Dangerfield exploding out of the centre square and driving his team towards goal. In eight matches this year, Dangerfield sent the Cats inside 50 on 10 plus occassions -- his career-high 16 against Melbourne in round 23 was a clear standout.Not only was 2016 a career-best year for inside 50s, but also for metres gained during a match -- two statistical areas he lead the competition in.It may not have been his most productive year in front of goal, but 23 goals in 22 home and away season matches can be considered an elite number for a midfielder. Not only was he damaging on the scoreboard, Dangerfield also had a career-best season with goal assists -- 0.92 per match.Of the 16 Brownlow Medal winners since 2000, Dangerfield is the only player to feature in the top five in all four categories. Wholesale Mets Jerseys . Speaking Thursday on TSN 1050 Thursday, the Leafs GM also touched on the questions surrounding the teams leadership and the struggles of his big-name free-agent signing. “Its not from lack of effort from the coaching staff. Cheap Gary Carter Jersey . The mixed zone is not a place to make friends. http://www.cheapmetsjerseys.com/?tag=cheap-lenny-dykstra-jersey . Speaking to the Chicago Tribune at baseballs Winter Meetings in Lake Buena Vista, Florida, Boras called the former home of the Expos a "tremendous environment" for baseball. Cheap Tim Tebow Jersey . -- Damian Lillard and LaMarcus Alrdridge were again the go-to duo for the Trail Blazers against the Kings. Cheap Pedro Martinez Jersey . It might not have mattered. While the Dodgers are preparing for the playoffs, the Padres showed their future has promise behind two rookies. The two-tier idea for Test cricket that was shelved at the ICC chief executives committee meeting in Dubai proposed to have the top seven ranked sides in the first tier, and the bottom three sides in the second tier along with Afghanistan and Ireland. ESPNcricinfo lists the pros and cons the system might have had. Benefits- The system would have given each Test series a context greater than just the bilateral trophy. Teams would have been encouraged to strive for the best possible result to improve their standing in the tier.- Increased opportunities for Associates to play long-form cricket and grow in competitiveness. Ireland and Afghanistan were to be the first Associate teams in the second tier, but there would have been the chance for the others to break into the second tier through a promotion and relegation system.- Better competitiveness in Test cricket with closer-matched teams playing each other, making it a more interesting contest for fans. For example, West Indies at No. 8 in the rankings would be able to play third-placed Australia only if they beecame competitive enough to climb into the top tier.ddddddddddddDrawbacks- A danger of widening the gulf between the top and bottom sides. Without playing higher-ranked teams, there was the chance the Full Members in the bottom tier would struggle to improve their Test cricket. Also, without the incentive of playing the best opponents, players might have increasingly been lost to the T20 circuit.- A concern the rich would become richer and the poor would become poorer. Without India, England and Australia (currently in the top tier) playing the bottom ranked teams, there was a danger that those boards would suffer financially. If there was to be a system of compensation to make up for a loss of TV earnings, it was not detailed in public.- Since the top-tier teams were meant to be obliged to play the bottom-tier teams occasionally, there would have been a danger of extremely lopsided contests, and the possibility of skewed records. ' ' '