TOKYO -- A Tokyo metropolitan government panel reviewing costly Olympic venues has proposed downgrading the expensive rowing and canoeing site for the Tokyo Games to temporary quality, or moving the events to an existing site in northern Japan.The city-commissioned panel of outside experts, in a report submitted to Tokyo Gov. Yuriko Koike on Tuesday, said a downgrade could decrease the estimated construction and operational cost of the Sea Forest venue from an original 70 billion yen ($700 million) to about 30 billion yen ($300 million).Alternatively, using the existing facility in Miyagi would require investing an estimated 35 billion yen ($350 million) to meet Olympic standards.Koike will discuss the report with officials from the International Olympic Committee and other parties later Tuesday.The panel of academics and business consultants that the governor set up has said the cost of the Olympics could exceed $30 billion -- four times the initial estimate -- unless drastic cuts are made.The panel came up with an option of moving rowing and canoeing to Naganuma, about 250 miles (400 kilometers) north of Tokyo, after the projected cost for a new venue in Tokyo Bay soared to $490 million, seven times the initial estimate. The Naganuma site is part of the area still recovering from the 2011 earthquake and tsunami.Panel chief Shinichi Ueyama said it is the only realistic alternative to the Sea Forest considering the additional construction work and other preparations which would be required.The report said that the total cost for the current Sea Forest site could be around 33 billion yen to 45 billion yen ($330 million to $450 million) if redesigned for largely temporary use.The city panel also proposed options of moving two other sports -- volleyball and swimming -- from planned new venues to existing ones. New Balance Outlet UK . However, he did make them miss him a little less. Cundiff, who had the unenviable job of replacing Dawson last season, agreed Thursday to a one-year, $1. New Balance Sale Outlet . Now, correct me if Im wrong but I saw one official distinctly pointing at the net indicating a good goal but after an inconclusive review they overturned the goal. Shouldnt the ruling on the ice (good goal) stand after an inconclusive review? Why was this overturned? James Veaudry Pembroke, ON -- Hey Kerry, Youll get a lot of these, but why was the Montreal goal against Nashville Saturday night overturned? Eller puts the puck on net and the on ice ruling from the ref behind the net is a Montreal goal. http://www.cheapnewbalanceuk.com/ . -- Cam Newton pranced into the end zone, placed his hands over his chest and did his familiar Superman pose. Cheap New Balance Uk .com) - Rafael Nadal, Andy Murray and Roger Federer were easy first-round winners Tuesday at the Australian Open. New Balance Sale Uk Online . Francis told several hundred members of the European Olympic Committees that when sport "is considered only in economic terms and consequently for victory at every cost . EUGENE, Ore. -- Ruthy Hebard had 15 points and 10 rebounds and Oregon blitzed No. 24 Michigan State 88-55 on Tuesday night.The Ducks (4-0) shot 53 percent after a slow start and led 65-26 after three quarters. The Spartans made 9 of 13 shots in the fourth, including all three of their 3-pointers after missing their first nine, but still shot just 32 percent (19 for 60). MSU also had 24 turnovers.Lexi Bando had all 11 of her points in the first quarter when Oregon took a 20-8 lead. Hebard had 10 poinnts and eight rebounds playing just eight minutes in the second half.dddddddddddd The Ducks led by 44 early in the fourth quarter. Morgan Yaeger added 10 points and eight different players had at least seven points.Tori Jankoska had 18 points for Michigan State, which was only allowing 51 points a game, and moved up to eighth on the school scoring list with 1,565 points. ' ' '